Aural Moon - Progressive Rock Discussion

Aural Moon - Progressive Rock Discussion (http://auralmoon.com/forum/index.php)
-   General Discussion/Prog News (http://auralmoon.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=5)
-   -   Errors / Typos in the playlist (http://auralmoon.com/forum/showthread.php?t=1017)

progdirjim 08-14-2004 12:21 AM

I would delete the older one if I were you. Not sure where that came from, nor what you might catch...;)

Roger -Dot- Lee 08-14-2004 12:58 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by progdirjim
I would delete the older one if I were you. Not sure where that came from, nor what you might catch...;)
That, sir, is why you always make sure you have a handy supply of latex gloves handy. *snap!*

Roger -Dot- Lee Bend over and cough.

progdirjim 08-14-2004 01:45 AM

reality check please
 
Does anyone else think we're funny? Or, I suppose, more importantly, does anyone else think we're stupid?

:rolleyes:

we'll stop, maybe, if you're not amused...

Roger -Dot- Lee 08-14-2004 02:18 AM

Re: reality check please
 
Quote:

Originally posted by progdirjim
Does anyone else think we're funny? Or, I suppose, more importantly, does anyone else think we're stupid?

:rolleyes:

we'll stop, maybe, if you're not amused...

My reality check just bounced.

Seriously, I write to amuse myself. If I happen to amuse someone else (and I'm told that I've been known to bring a smile to a face on occasion), then bully-hail-fellow-rock-my-world. But I write for ME, and will likely continue to do just that.

If someone thinks that what I write is stupid, they're welcome to their own opinions, no matter how wrong they are.

If they think *I'M* stupid, again, they're entitled to their opinion, no matter how wrong it is, and I'll gladly debate them to show them.

Roger -Dot- Lee who may well be easily amused.

KeithieW 08-14-2004 03:04 AM

Re: Re: reality check please
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Roger Lee
I'll gladly debate them to show them.

Roger -Dot- Lee who may well be easily amused.

Get enough of us together and we can have a Mass Debate.........maybe not we'd end up being a bunch of w**k**s. :D

teermin8r 08-14-2004 07:39 AM

I vote for funny. Always brings a smile to me. :D Keep it up.

Rick and Roll 08-14-2004 11:36 AM

Re: reality check please
 
Quote:

Originally posted by progdirjim
Does anyone else think we're funny? Or, I suppose, more importantly, does anyone else think we're stupid?

:rolleyes:

we'll stop, maybe, if you're not amused...

Hey I don't mind.....keep it going...contrary to popular opinion I don't reply to EVERYTHING...;)

teermin8r 08-14-2004 11:47 AM

Uh, Rick. Uh, you just did. :D

Steady Stan 08-18-2004 08:22 AM

Anyone else notice
 
that if you're searching for a particular artist, that has more than 50 results, when you click on next, it takes you to the second page of the entire playlist, not the searched artist?

Or is it me?

KeithieW 08-18-2004 08:24 AM

Re: Anyone else notice
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Steady Stan
Or is it me?
No Stan it's not just you....... :D

Miss you mate!!!!!

Yesspaz 08-18-2004 08:40 AM

Re: Anyone else notice
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Steady Stan
that if you're searching for a particular artist, that has more than 50 results, when you click on next, it takes you to the second page of the entire playlist, not the searched artist?

Or is it me?

it's not just you. this happens to me too.

Rick and Roll 08-18-2004 09:02 AM

you are correct
 
it is a very frustrating thing.

Roger -Dot- Lee 08-18-2004 09:22 AM

Re: Anyone else notice
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Steady Stan
that if you're searching for a particular artist, that has more than 50 results, when you click on next, it takes you to the second page of the entire playlist, not the searched artist?

Or is it me?

I've noticed that too. As I don't speak php very well, I don't know why it's doing that. I always just set my searches to 100 and/or narrow my search down some.

Roger -Dot- Lee

Steady Stan 08-18-2004 04:19 PM

It used to work properly, so I'm sure it can be fixed.

Roger -Dot- Lee 08-18-2004 04:21 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Steady Stan
It used to work properly, so I'm sure it can be fixed.
I'm quite sure it can as well.

I'm just not sure how.

Roger -Dot- Lee

Yesspaz 08-19-2004 01:01 AM

Now that the move to add Dream Theater has happened, I wonder if it's not time for "Truth in Advertising"? Dream Theater has been on AM for quite a while, but incognito! There is a song here listed as "Steve Howe - Yes Medley." It's actually Steve Howe guesting with Dream Theater. It's a live DT track and Steve is introduced, comes on stage, and plays with them. It probably should be called "Dream Theater - Yes Medley (f/Steve Howe)" or somesuch. Thanks.


...now the truth can be told...



PS, just wondering, but the original I heard on "some other station" was upwards of 8 or 10 minutes. This one just cuts off at the 5:18 mark really abruptly. Anyone know why?

Yesspaz 08-19-2004 01:08 AM

Tarentel
 
There are two Tarentel songs here that have an "error." These two tracks were originally released as a 7" vinyl, showing two sides of Tarentel's ambient side (follow that?). Side one was guitar-ambient and side two was keyboard-ambient. Thus, they were creatively named:

Two Sides of Myself, Side One
Two Sides of Myself, Side Two

However, when another label picked up Tarentel's back catalog of vinyl releases and put them out on cd, they screwed it up and put:

Two Sides of Myself, Part One
Two Sides of Myself, Part Two

This is the same style mistake as Steve Howe's "Clap/The Clap" type thing. Anyhoozal, the AM library has them as Part One and Part Two, rather than Side One and Side Two. The original "Side" play on words is the band's intention, as they corrected this mistake on their old website. I wasn't aware of this discrepency when I donated Tarentel or I would've noted it then.

Thanks R.L. Keep up the good work. It's stress relief after helping engineers understand the point of two power supplies.

Roger -Dot- Lee 08-19-2004 05:07 AM

Re: Tarentel
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Yesspaz
There are two Tarentel songs here that have an "error." These two tracks were originally released as a 7" vinyl, showing two sides of Tarentel's ambient side (follow that?). Side one was guitar-ambient and side two was keyboard-ambient. Thus, they were creatively named:

Hrm. It looks like they didn't catch the subtlety when they burned the CD.

Fixed!

Roger -Dot- Lee

Steady Stan 08-19-2004 06:58 AM

Reinassance
 
There are three songs listed under the band name of Reinassance. Obviously, that should be changed to Renaissance.

Also, the song "The Vulture Fly High", should be plural, as there's a whole flock of 'em.

Roger, all of us anal retentive types salute you & your efforts!!

SS

Rick and Roll 08-19-2004 08:12 AM

Actually
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Yesspaz
Dream Theater has been on AM for quite a while, but incognito!
it's called Liquid Tension Experiment. That's just DT without the vocals.

to me, DT is not unappealing cause of the vocals. It's the overblown arrangements and soloing. Otherwise, I would have given up on IQ a long time ago (can't stand the vocals on Wake and Lush Attic, but they're great records).


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:18 AM.

Integrated by BBpixel Team 2025 :: jvbPlugin R1011.362.1
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.